<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Portrait Professional Forums - All Forums]]></title>
		<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Portrait Professional Forums - http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Black & White photos]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2994</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2994</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Please could you make PP compatible with b&amp;w photos?<br />
Maybe add a setting to select if the photo is in colour or in black and white?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Please could you make PP compatible with b&amp;w photos?<br />
Maybe add a setting to select if the photo is in colour or in black and white?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Many of my Face Sculpt Sliders have disappeared!]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2992</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2992</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello all,<br />
<br />
Wondering whether anyone can help with this.<br />
When i started to do work on an image this evening i noticed that many of the sliders in the Face Sculpt section of the control panel were totally missing. Forehead, Jaw, Nose and Neck are all gone, leaving only Eyes and Mouth Shape. I've no idea what caused it, as it was fine a few days ago. What do i need to do to get these back?! I really rely on these features, and any advice would be greatly appreciated,<br />
<br />
Thank you!!<br />
Marc<br />
<br />
<img src="http://i258.photobucket.com/albums/hh258/thedeepend01/c3c4664b.png" border="0" alt="[Image: c3c4664b.png]" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hello all,<br />
<br />
Wondering whether anyone can help with this.<br />
When i started to do work on an image this evening i noticed that many of the sliders in the Face Sculpt section of the control panel were totally missing. Forehead, Jaw, Nose and Neck are all gone, leaving only Eyes and Mouth Shape. I've no idea what caused it, as it was fine a few days ago. What do i need to do to get these back?! I really rely on these features, and any advice would be greatly appreciated,<br />
<br />
Thank you!!<br />
Marc<br />
<br />
<img src="http://i258.photobucket.com/albums/hh258/thedeepend01/c3c4664b.png" border="0" alt="[Image: c3c4664b.png]" />]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Multiple faces in image]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2991</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2991</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[This was copied from another thread. (moderator)<br />
<br />
<blockquote><cite><span> (02-05-2012 03:26 PM)</span>bythecshore Wrote: <a href="http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?pid=8525#pid8525" class="quick_jump">&nbsp;</a></cite><blockquote><cite><span> (02-05-2012 12:27 AM)</span>bythecshore Wrote: <a href="http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?pid=8521#pid8521" class="quick_jump">&nbsp;</a></cite>When i worked on a first face in a photo, the second face was so close to the first face that it got slightly "bent" out of shape from my working on the first face.  Is there a way to isolate each face as I work on it?</blockquote>
<blockquote><cite><span> (02-05-2012 12:50 AM)</span>tebogan Wrote: <a href="http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?pid=8522#pid8522" class="quick_jump">&nbsp;</a></cite>This can occur when you use face enhancements that change the face to make it thinner. It has been my experience when working with multiple faces in an image that i turn the face enhancements off.</blockquote>
<br />
Thanks, that's what I figured.  <br />
<br />
A suggestion for the future is to add a tool that allows one to isolate an area of a photograph temporarily so that face enhancements can be used in multi-face photos (where the faces are close together).</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[This was copied from another thread. (moderator)<br />
<br />
<blockquote><cite><span> (02-05-2012 03:26 PM)</span>bythecshore Wrote: <a href="http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?pid=8525#pid8525" class="quick_jump">&nbsp;</a></cite><blockquote><cite><span> (02-05-2012 12:27 AM)</span>bythecshore Wrote: <a href="http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?pid=8521#pid8521" class="quick_jump">&nbsp;</a></cite>When i worked on a first face in a photo, the second face was so close to the first face that it got slightly "bent" out of shape from my working on the first face.  Is there a way to isolate each face as I work on it?</blockquote>
<blockquote><cite><span> (02-05-2012 12:50 AM)</span>tebogan Wrote: <a href="http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?pid=8522#pid8522" class="quick_jump">&nbsp;</a></cite>This can occur when you use face enhancements that change the face to make it thinner. It has been my experience when working with multiple faces in an image that i turn the face enhancements off.</blockquote>
<br />
Thanks, that's what I figured.  <br />
<br />
A suggestion for the future is to add a tool that allows one to isolate an area of a photograph temporarily so that face enhancements can be used in multi-face photos (where the faces are close together).</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sharing my experiences]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2989</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2989</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[1. If I think I have over edit/touch up and would like to see how it looks "in between", ie, perhaps slightly lighter, I would slide the opacity and see the different strength. I would stop sliding when I see a good balance.<br />
<br />
2. If I am not sure about customer's reaction and may like to continue editing after showing them. I would use Save Session. File-&gt;Save Session. This option is not available from plugin.<br />
<br />
3. Although PP can open RAW file, I seldom use it because of it limited control. I would use PS or Lightroom to open RAW file and from there, I use plugin to go to PP.<br />
<br />
4. In my workflow, I open my image on PS, make a duplicate layer and use the duplicated layer for PP processing. Only after PP, I will continue to edit on PS. The original layer will be kept just in case it is needed.<br />
<br />
5. If I need to make a composite photo, eg, combining body parts from different shots, I would do it before calling up PP. The different layers in PS need to be merged (and/or duplicated) before going to PP. Avoid transparency in PS before going to PP.<br />
<br />
6. If there are more than one face to be edited in PP, avoid smoothing or blurring any part of the image before sending to PP. <br />
<br />
... more to come]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[1. If I think I have over edit/touch up and would like to see how it looks "in between", ie, perhaps slightly lighter, I would slide the opacity and see the different strength. I would stop sliding when I see a good balance.<br />
<br />
2. If I am not sure about customer's reaction and may like to continue editing after showing them. I would use Save Session. File-&gt;Save Session. This option is not available from plugin.<br />
<br />
3. Although PP can open RAW file, I seldom use it because of it limited control. I would use PS or Lightroom to open RAW file and from there, I use plugin to go to PP.<br />
<br />
4. In my workflow, I open my image on PS, make a duplicate layer and use the duplicated layer for PP processing. Only after PP, I will continue to edit on PS. The original layer will be kept just in case it is needed.<br />
<br />
5. If I need to make a composite photo, eg, combining body parts from different shots, I would do it before calling up PP. The different layers in PS need to be merged (and/or duplicated) before going to PP. Avoid transparency in PS before going to PP.<br />
<br />
6. If there are more than one face to be edited in PP, avoid smoothing or blurring any part of the image before sending to PP. <br />
<br />
... more to come]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Catch lights]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2987</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2987</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Is there a way to move the catch lights around when you add them in the control panel?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is there a way to move the catch lights around when you add them in the control panel?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Plugin for Photoshop CS5 isn't?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2984</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2984</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[THe plugin installed with studio version doesn't apear to be a plugin at all but a stand-alone application Photoshop allows to be started from within the program. This is causes me to open a second copy (the one saved as in PP) to continue working on the Photoshop images I needed to alter during a photoshop session. I end up with several copies of the file I only wanted one copy of.<br />
<br />
Is there some way I can cause PP on return to Photoshop to display the saved as image and not cause me to open that image as a seperate edit?<br />
<br />
I can get the same effect of opening an outside application by using Adobe's lightroom method of creating plugins. Intergration doesn't seem to be functioning as a plugin but open an external program. <br />
<br />
AJ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[THe plugin installed with studio version doesn't apear to be a plugin at all but a stand-alone application Photoshop allows to be started from within the program. This is causes me to open a second copy (the one saved as in PP) to continue working on the Photoshop images I needed to alter during a photoshop session. I end up with several copies of the file I only wanted one copy of.<br />
<br />
Is there some way I can cause PP on return to Photoshop to display the saved as image and not cause me to open that image as a seperate edit?<br />
<br />
I can get the same effect of opening an outside application by using Adobe's lightroom method of creating plugins. Intergration doesn't seem to be functioning as a plugin but open an external program. <br />
<br />
AJ]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Using pre-update version on a notebook]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2983</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2983</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I have just updated from standard to studio and wondered if the standard version can now be de-activated from my workstation and re-activated on my notebook, effectively giving me the two copies required for use on a pc at work and notebook at home.<br />
<br />
I don't know of to many working photographers who have a studio or work on location that wouldn't want things this way. Still, you made the rules we only make the choices. I selected PP over rivals because I thought it the best program for my applications.<br />
<br />
AJ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have just updated from standard to studio and wondered if the standard version can now be de-activated from my workstation and re-activated on my notebook, effectively giving me the two copies required for use on a pc at work and notebook at home.<br />
<br />
I don't know of to many working photographers who have a studio or work on location that wouldn't want things this way. Still, you made the rules we only make the choices. I selected PP over rivals because I thought it the best program for my applications.<br />
<br />
AJ]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IPTC Data]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2977</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2977</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I use Portrait Professional 64 V10x in a Win 7 system. I use Photo Mechanic to tag and add IPTC data to my images. However, after using Portrait Professional to edit the image, this data has been stripped out of the image file (it is embedded rather than a sidecar). It sure would be nice if this didn't happen.<br />
<br />
Mick]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I use Portrait Professional 64 V10x in a Win 7 system. I use Photo Mechanic to tag and add IPTC data to my images. However, after using Portrait Professional to edit the image, this data has been stripped out of the image file (it is embedded rather than a sidecar). It sure would be nice if this didn't happen.<br />
<br />
Mick]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Reset to original settings]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2976</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2976</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I recently shot a model who had stretch marks on her stomach from pregnancy.  I altered the settings to try to include her stomach as I was repairing the image.  It didn't work too well.  Anyway, I can't figure out what I changed, and now when I am working on photos, nothing I do seems to be altered.  I've tried tried to figure out what I changed and also to see if there is somewhere I can "reset" to the original settings in place when I first installed the software.  If anyone knows, I'd appreciate a hand.  Thanks, Larry]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I recently shot a model who had stretch marks on her stomach from pregnancy.  I altered the settings to try to include her stomach as I was repairing the image.  It didn't work too well.  Anyway, I can't figure out what I changed, and now when I am working on photos, nothing I do seems to be altered.  I've tried tried to figure out what I changed and also to see if there is somewhere I can "reset" to the original settings in place when I first installed the software.  If anyone knows, I'd appreciate a hand.  Thanks, Larry]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The February Competition]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2975</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2975</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[The February Competition is now open!!!!!<br />
<br />
You can view the rules and guidelines in <a href="http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2780" target="_blank">this post</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The February Competition is now open!!!!!<br />
<br />
You can view the rules and guidelines in <a href="http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2780" target="_blank">this post</a>.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[10.7 release notes?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2974</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2974</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello,<br />
<br />
nice to see you are still updating PP10 while I guess you must be busy preparing for version 11.<br />
<br />
Would you mind providing some release notes for the new version 10.7, so I can judge if I should update?<br />
<br />
Thanks - MacSass]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hello,<br />
<br />
nice to see you are still updating PP10 while I guess you must be busy preparing for version 11.<br />
<br />
Would you mind providing some release notes for the new version 10.7, so I can judge if I should update?<br />
<br />
Thanks - MacSass]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[v10.7 install pblms (upgrade from 10.6) Studio]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2973</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2973</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[The Installation routine still remains in need of improvement to correct bugs and more properly ensure an appropriate installation.<br />
<br />
The Download of 10.7 Studio was saved to Hard drive w/o any errors.  Running the installation .exe proceeded normally and didn't advise of any problems.  I accepted PS plugin installer and to launch PP.<br />
<br />
This is on a Win XP Pro SP3 system w/ plenty of drive and RAM and CPU capacity.  10.6 Studio was already installed on the system and I did not uninstall it first.  I don't remember if uninstalling is a necessary prerequisite, but if it is, the installer should prompt to advise so or take care of doing so.<br />
<br />
Installer removed the previous PP Desktop Icon and failed to generate a new one.  The Installer also failed to populate the Program listing on the All Programs Start Menu.  The item Portrait Professional Studio 10 item now reads: "Empty".  There is no listing for Portrait Professional Studio 10 on the Control Panel's Add/Remove Programs!<br />
<br />
PP 10.7 launches fine, either directly, of from within PS.  However, <br />
when the step of placing the right mouth corner crosshair is clicked, the following error appears: <br />
<br />
"Failed to load application data<br />
ZFileException: Missing file K:\Portrait Professional Studio 10\data\femaleright.zb<br />
Please try reinstalling the application"<br />
<br />
Anthropics has got to do better with the installation procedure!  This is not the first time I have encountered pblms with the Installer, and others have posted their installation problems on the Forums.  This is way more cumbersome of an upgrade installation than with other programs!  This will frustrate and deter customers, and is easy to prevent by using a more competent installation script.<br />
<br />
Rerunning the installer .exe file didn't remedy the problem.  Will now have to re-download to assure the download was good and remove the existing version 10.6 Studio manually and reinstall from scratch.<br />
<br />
Will you guys please get this fixed already!!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Installation routine still remains in need of improvement to correct bugs and more properly ensure an appropriate installation.<br />
<br />
The Download of 10.7 Studio was saved to Hard drive w/o any errors.  Running the installation .exe proceeded normally and didn't advise of any problems.  I accepted PS plugin installer and to launch PP.<br />
<br />
This is on a Win XP Pro SP3 system w/ plenty of drive and RAM and CPU capacity.  10.6 Studio was already installed on the system and I did not uninstall it first.  I don't remember if uninstalling is a necessary prerequisite, but if it is, the installer should prompt to advise so or take care of doing so.<br />
<br />
Installer removed the previous PP Desktop Icon and failed to generate a new one.  The Installer also failed to populate the Program listing on the All Programs Start Menu.  The item Portrait Professional Studio 10 item now reads: "Empty".  There is no listing for Portrait Professional Studio 10 on the Control Panel's Add/Remove Programs!<br />
<br />
PP 10.7 launches fine, either directly, of from within PS.  However, <br />
when the step of placing the right mouth corner crosshair is clicked, the following error appears: <br />
<br />
"Failed to load application data<br />
ZFileException: Missing file K:\Portrait Professional Studio 10\data\femaleright.zb<br />
Please try reinstalling the application"<br />
<br />
Anthropics has got to do better with the installation procedure!  This is not the first time I have encountered pblms with the Installer, and others have posted their installation problems on the Forums.  This is way more cumbersome of an upgrade installation than with other programs!  This will frustrate and deter customers, and is easy to prevent by using a more competent installation script.<br />
<br />
Rerunning the installer .exe file didn't remedy the problem.  Will now have to re-download to assure the download was good and remove the existing version 10.6 Studio manually and reinstall from scratch.<br />
<br />
Will you guys please get this fixed already!!!!!!!!!!!!]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Standard vs. Studio]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2971</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2971</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I am considering buying this program, and, although I usually buy the best (most expensive) version of a program, I could not see anything in the edition list that justified my buying the Studio version.  I do have Windows 7, 64 bits, but I don't know if it just being "optimized" for 64 bits will justify the steep difference in the price between the two versions.  I am not cheap, but, since this software will just be used to tweak photos for family and friends, that is quite a difference in price.  I wouldn't mind paying it if I could just know why I should.<br />
<br />
It appears one "pro" would be the free upgrade to version 11 Masters; however, we can't get any indication that new features other than optimization improvement for 64 will be in that version.<br />
<br />
I am so frustrated in making this decision that I am considering not buying any until the Version 11 comes out and I can see the feature list comparison.<br />
<br />
Is there anyone out there with the experience of using the Standard and then the Studio that could/would share some input?  I sure would appreciate it.<br />
<br />
This software looks simply awesome.  I was sooooo impressed by everyone's examples.  Help me make the right decision, please.  <img src="images/smilies/biggrin.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Big Grin" title="Big Grin" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I am considering buying this program, and, although I usually buy the best (most expensive) version of a program, I could not see anything in the edition list that justified my buying the Studio version.  I do have Windows 7, 64 bits, but I don't know if it just being "optimized" for 64 bits will justify the steep difference in the price between the two versions.  I am not cheap, but, since this software will just be used to tweak photos for family and friends, that is quite a difference in price.  I wouldn't mind paying it if I could just know why I should.<br />
<br />
It appears one "pro" would be the free upgrade to version 11 Masters; however, we can't get any indication that new features other than optimization improvement for 64 will be in that version.<br />
<br />
I am so frustrated in making this decision that I am considering not buying any until the Version 11 comes out and I can see the feature list comparison.<br />
<br />
Is there anyone out there with the experience of using the Standard and then the Studio that could/would share some input?  I sure would appreciate it.<br />
<br />
This software looks simply awesome.  I was sooooo impressed by everyone's examples.  Help me make the right decision, please.  <img src="images/smilies/biggrin.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Big Grin" title="Big Grin" />]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Version 11]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2969</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2969</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Is there any more news on the release date of Version 11 or at least hints of what we are to expect.<br />
<br />
There seems lots of pushing to get us to upgrade ready for the new version but no incentives even though you have been talking about it for a fair while now]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is there any more news on the release date of Version 11 or at least hints of what we are to expect.<br />
<br />
There seems lots of pushing to get us to upgrade ready for the new version but no incentives even though you have been talking about it for a fair while now]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[removing other versions of PP]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2968</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2968</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I recently upgraded to Studio64 edition and want to remove my other editions. How can I do this with out affecting my Studio64 edition??????]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I recently upgraded to Studio64 edition and want to remove my other editions. How can I do this with out affecting my Studio64 edition??????]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Saving To Work Again (quick question)]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2966</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2966</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes, I'm not sure there is a way to do this or not and I admit to not having looked for a solution--I'm just going on memory.<br />
<br />
So, I had a client who wanted facial retouching. But, she didn't want it overdone. So I gave it my best shot. Turns out, she wanted a bit more. So, I had to start from scratch...marking everything, etc. <br />
<br />
I know I could have saved the sliders but I think, if my memory is correct, threre isn't anything to save up the markings.  <br />
<br />
It would be nice if I could set up a photo, mark it, slide it, and save it (and all the markings and sliders for it into some kind of "project" file) in case I went overboard or didn't do enough.<br />
<br />
I don't want anyone to go researching this for me (I can do that). I was just hoping if there was a simple way to do it and someone has used it or knows about it, they could simply say it could be done in a quick 25-30 word answer.<br />
<br />
Thanks in advance. <img src="images/smilies/smile.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Smile" title="Smile" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes, I'm not sure there is a way to do this or not and I admit to not having looked for a solution--I'm just going on memory.<br />
<br />
So, I had a client who wanted facial retouching. But, she didn't want it overdone. So I gave it my best shot. Turns out, she wanted a bit more. So, I had to start from scratch...marking everything, etc. <br />
<br />
I know I could have saved the sliders but I think, if my memory is correct, threre isn't anything to save up the markings.  <br />
<br />
It would be nice if I could set up a photo, mark it, slide it, and save it (and all the markings and sliders for it into some kind of "project" file) in case I went overboard or didn't do enough.<br />
<br />
I don't want anyone to go researching this for me (I can do that). I was just hoping if there was a simple way to do it and someone has used it or knows about it, they could simply say it could be done in a quick 25-30 word answer.<br />
<br />
Thanks in advance. <img src="images/smilies/smile.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Smile" title="Smile" />]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Two faces in a Photograph?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2965</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2965</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi,<br />
<br />
I saw that PP has won several awards recently... CONGRATS!<br />
<br />
I also noticed that Wedding Photographers are a big user of this product. Does that mean that within a photo that has 2 or more people that each one 'face' can be worked on?<br />
<br />
I know I'm dreaming, but it gives one thoughts on how wedding photographers are using this beyond 'photo of the bride'...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi,<br />
<br />
I saw that PP has won several awards recently... CONGRATS!<br />
<br />
I also noticed that Wedding Photographers are a big user of this product. Does that mean that within a photo that has 2 or more people that each one 'face' can be worked on?<br />
<br />
I know I'm dreaming, but it gives one thoughts on how wedding photographers are using this beyond 'photo of the bride'...]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Corel AfterShot Pro and PSP X4 plugin compatibility]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2964</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2964</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Now that Corel has recently acquired Bibble Labs, what had been previously sold as Bibble Pro 5 RAW Conversion Technology, has now been improved and comprises the core of Corel's just introduced AfterShot Pro RAW Converter product.  This joins Corel's PaintShop Pro X4 Ultimate to bring Corel into a far more adept position to offer feature rich photo editing suite of products.<br />
<br />
It would be terrific if Anthropics could work out an arrangement with Corel for Portrait Professional and Smart Editor to be accessible directly as plugins for Corel's image editing products.<br />
<br />
Ideally, directly at the RAW image stage as opposed to the TIFF or JPG level.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Now that Corel has recently acquired Bibble Labs, what had been previously sold as Bibble Pro 5 RAW Conversion Technology, has now been improved and comprises the core of Corel's just introduced AfterShot Pro RAW Converter product.  This joins Corel's PaintShop Pro X4 Ultimate to bring Corel into a far more adept position to offer feature rich photo editing suite of products.<br />
<br />
It would be terrific if Anthropics could work out an arrangement with Corel for Portrait Professional and Smart Editor to be accessible directly as plugins for Corel's image editing products.<br />
<br />
Ideally, directly at the RAW image stage as opposed to the TIFF or JPG level.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[image number]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2963</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2963</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[What steps do I need to take to keep my uploaded image numbers(and then exported) intact? The original photo image number are references and I need to maintain them. Right now, my photos are being renumbered by PP when they are exported.<br />
<br />
I'd appreciate any advice on this subject, as I can't seem to find it in the program's help section.<br />
<br />
Thanks![/size]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[What steps do I need to take to keep my uploaded image numbers(and then exported) intact? The original photo image number are references and I need to maintain them. Right now, my photos are being renumbered by PP when they are exported.<br />
<br />
I'd appreciate any advice on this subject, as I can't seem to find it in the program's help section.<br />
<br />
Thanks![/size]]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[WTF INVALID TOKEN !!!!]]></title>
			<link>http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2962</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.portraitprofessional.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=2962</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[CAN SOMEBODY TELL ME HOW I CAN REACTIVATE THE SOFTWARE IF MY ACTIVATION TOKEN IS ALREADY ACTIVE.<br />
<br />
THE SOFTWARE UNINSTALL BY IT SELF AND NOW IS NOT LETTING ME ACTIVATE !!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[CAN SOMEBODY TELL ME HOW I CAN REACTIVATE THE SOFTWARE IF MY ACTIVATION TOKEN IS ALREADY ACTIVE.<br />
<br />
THE SOFTWARE UNINSTALL BY IT SELF AND NOW IS NOT LETTING ME ACTIVATE !!!]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
